Why is there a "Protective Order" in City of San Francisco v NAF

Wrongful Arbitration


Wednesday, September 30. 2009

Why is there a "Protective Order" in City of San Francisco v NAF


The San Francisco City Attorney's Office, led by Dennis Herrera, filed suit against the National Arbitration Forum March 24, 2008. According to http://thehill.com/homenews/house/60793-rep-kucinich-flap-reveals-sensitivity-of-contacts-with-courts-prosecutors, all the filings and discovery are under a 'protective order' issued by an Francisco Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer.

This is the standard behavior pattern of billionaires and movie stars, and those that don't want any raking through the muck. See Case Number: CGC-08-473569.

Read the protective order here.
Posted by
Steve
in NAF National Arbitration Forum at 06:47 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Short URL for this article
Tweet This!
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
No comments
Add Comment
Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
   
 

National Arbitration Forum Claims Handling Analysis

CALIFORNIA 1281.96 REPORTING ANALYSIS

OVER 60,000 RECORDS SLICED AND DICED

We can provide valuable information regarding the Arbitrator that signed-off on the Arbitration Award. You could attack the award if the Arbitrator was not neutral, as claimed and required.

We can provide the following on a fixed price quote and hours-long turn around:
  • Arbitrator background
  • Number of arbitrations handled by that Arbitrator for that date, the then current quarter, and increments since reporting began
  • The 'win-loss' statistics defining how many times the Arbitrator ruled for a business or a consumer
  • The aggregate dollars awarded, as above, by date or time period
  • The aggregate dollars awarded, as above, to the businesses associated with those awards (consumers remain nameless in 1281.96 filings)

    If you have any special request, we will be happy to quote you our top-notch speedy data analysis services!

    Call 888-501-3524 ASK FOR STEVE

    Coming Soon - Self-serve web based analysis engine!

    • Know thy Enemy- the NAF

    South Carolina Supreme Court Invalidates Agreement, Refuses to Appoint Alternate Arbitrator Upon Administrator?s Refusal to Hear Healthcare Dispute

    Tuesday, July 7. 2009
    Non-Mutual Arbitration Obligation Invalidates Arbitration Agreement Incident to Consumer Loan Contract

    Friday, June 26. 2009
    Georgia Law Prohibiting Enforcement of Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements in Medical Malpractice Context Preempted by FAA

    Friday, June 26. 2009
    Wrongful Death Claims Derivative and Arbitrable Under Texas and Federal Law, Says Fifth Circuit

    Friday, May 22. 2009
    California Federal District Court Adopts Minority View that CROA Claims Must Be Litigated

    Tuesday, May 12. 2009
    Fifth Circuit Adopts Rule Recognizing Plaintiff?s Greater Tendency to Waive Right to Arbitrate By Filing Suit

    Tuesday, May 12. 2009

    Categories



    All categories

    Twitter