Gordon & Wong Enters Orange County Court on behalf of MBNA

Wrongful Arbitration


Wednesday, November 15. 2006

Gordon & Wong Enters Orange County Court on behalf of MBNA

The Gordon & Wong Law Group PC has now officially entered the Orange County Court with numerous filings on behalf of FIA Card Services, formerly MBNA Card Services.

According to the gordonwong.com website, the firm has "50 years of experience" and the "GORDON & WONG LAW GROUP has perfected the process of economically collecting your claim."

An initial scan of filings show that the firm is relying upon the Arbitration stuffer and clauses claimed by MBNA - FIA Card Services.

We note their strategy is to file these:
  • PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
  • MOTION TO COMPEL/CONFIRM ARBITRATION

    In almost all of the cases we are watching and monitoring, Gordon & Wong is unopposed in the courthouse!

    Don't let this happen to you - Contact us to fight Gordon & Wong in Orange County Court.
    • Posted by
    Steve
    in Law Firm Collectors at 11:49 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
    Short URL for this article
    Tweet This!
    Trackbacks
    Trackback specific URI for this entry
    No Trackbacks
    Comments
    Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)
    No comments
    Add Comment
    Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
    Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

    To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
    CAPTCHA

     
       
     

    National Arbitration Forum Claims Handling Analysis

    CALIFORNIA 1281.96 REPORTING ANALYSIS

    OVER 60,000 RECORDS SLICED AND DICED

    We can provide valuable information regarding the Arbitrator that signed-off on the Arbitration Award. You could attack the award if the Arbitrator was not neutral, as claimed and required.

    We can provide the following on a fixed price quote and hours-long turn around:
  • Arbitrator background
  • Number of arbitrations handled by that Arbitrator for that date, the then current quarter, and increments since reporting began
  • The 'win-loss' statistics defining how many times the Arbitrator ruled for a business or a consumer
  • The aggregate dollars awarded, as above, by date or time period
  • The aggregate dollars awarded, as above, to the businesses associated with those awards (consumers remain nameless in 1281.96 filings)

    If you have any special request, we will be happy to quote you our top-notch speedy data analysis services!

    Call 888-501-3524 ASK FOR STEVE

    Coming Soon - Self-serve web based analysis engine!

    • Know thy Enemy- the NAF

    South Carolina Supreme Court Invalidates Agreement, Refuses to Appoint Alternate Arbitrator Upon Administrator?s Refusal to Hear Healthcare Dispute

    Tuesday, July 7. 2009
    Non-Mutual Arbitration Obligation Invalidates Arbitration Agreement Incident to Consumer Loan Contract

    Friday, June 26. 2009
    Georgia Law Prohibiting Enforcement of Pre-Dispute Arbitration Agreements in Medical Malpractice Context Preempted by FAA

    Friday, June 26. 2009
    Wrongful Death Claims Derivative and Arbitrable Under Texas and Federal Law, Says Fifth Circuit

    Friday, May 22. 2009
    California Federal District Court Adopts Minority View that CROA Claims Must Be Litigated

    Tuesday, May 12. 2009
    Fifth Circuit Adopts Rule Recognizing Plaintiff?s Greater Tendency to Waive Right to Arbitrate By Filing Suit

    Tuesday, May 12. 2009

    Categories



    All categories

    Twitter